Renault Clio 2009 vs Toyota Auris 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Auris is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 26 HP less power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Toyota Auris. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Auris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 19 cm shorter than the Toyota Auris, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 750 litres | |
|
Toyota Auris has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 62 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |