Renault Clio 2009 vs Kia Venga 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 105 NM | 137 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
Kia Venga is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 15 HP less power than Kia Venga, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Kia Venga. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 48 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.03 m | 4.07 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.60 m | |
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 4 cm shorter than the Kia Venga, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 440 litres | |
Kia Venga has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 152 litres less trunk space than the Kia Venga. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Venga. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`710 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Kia Venga has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Kia Venga, so Kia Venga quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2800 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Kia Venga has
| |