Renault Clio 2008 vs Skoda Fabia 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Renault Clio) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Fabia) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
| Renault Clio is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 7 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1226 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 41 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |