Renault Clio 2008 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Renault Clio) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Roomster) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 30 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 135 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Roomster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Roomster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.61 m | |
| Renault Clio and Skoda Roomster are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1780 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 11 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |