Renault Clio 2008 vs Kia Ceed 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Renault Clio) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Kia Ceed) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 40 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 27 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 534 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1664 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 95 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Ceed has
| |