Renault Clio 2008 vs Dacia Logan 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Renault Clio) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Dacia Logan) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 18 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 7 HP more power than Dacia Logan, but torque is 55 NM less than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.3 | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 25 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 700 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2350 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 261 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`796 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |