Renault Clio 2009 vs Renault Scenic 2003
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 13 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Renault Twingo | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2003 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 9 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |