Renault Clio 2009 vs Volkswagen Golf 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Despite less power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Clio is 31 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 66 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |