Renault Clio 2009 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
| Renault Clio is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 7 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 41 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`694 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |