Renault Clio 2009 vs Skoda Roomster 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1780 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 11 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Roomster has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Roomster, so Skoda Roomster quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |