Renault Clio 2009 vs Peugeot 207 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 207 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP less power than Peugeot 207, but torque is 5 NM more than Peugeot 207. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 207. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 207 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
| Renault Clio is 8 cm longer than the Peugeot 207, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 439 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1258 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 102 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 207. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 207, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`758 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 207, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Peugeot 207 has
| |