Renault Clio 2013 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 60 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 530 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 87 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`711 | 1`596 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Fabia is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |