Renault Clio 2013 vs Skoda Roomster 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Roomster is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Roomster, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Skoda Roomster. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Roomster, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Skoda Roomster has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 37 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Roomster. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Roomster. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`711 | 1`777 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Roomster has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio, so Skoda Roomster quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Roomster has
| |