Renault Clio 2013 vs Skoda Octavia 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Octavia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 26 HP less power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 42 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 640 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1700 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 197 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`711 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Skoda Octavia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |