Renault Clio 2013 vs Hyundai i30 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 46 HP less power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Hyundai i30. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 22 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1642 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 85 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`711 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i30 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |