Renault Clio 2013 vs Skoda Fabia 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.4 | |
| Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1380 litres | 1395 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 15 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`640 kg | 1`609 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`055 kg | 1`079 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 585 kg | 530 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Skoda Fabia. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |