Renault Clio 2013 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 530 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 87 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`596 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Fabia is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |