Renault Clio 2013 vs Renault Megane 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 25 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 30 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1595 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 81 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Megane has
| |