Renault Clio 2013 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
| Renault Clio and Renault Captur have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.57 m | |
| Renault Clio is 15 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 66 litres more trunk space than the Renault Captur. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`658 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests, but Renault Captur is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Captur has
| |