Renault Clio 2013 vs Peugeot 208 2012
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 22 HP more power than Peugeot 208, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Peugeot 208. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.3 | |
| Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 208, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 208 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Used also on Citroen C3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Renault Clio is 31 cm longer than the Peugeot 208, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1076 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 158 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 208. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 208. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`527 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 208 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Peugeot 208 has
| |