Renault Clio 2013 vs Hyundai i30 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 242 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 50 HP less power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 107 NM less than Hyundai i30. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Kia XCeed | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i30 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 32 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 602 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1650 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 159 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests, but Hyundai i30 is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |