Renault Clio 2013 vs Dacia Logan 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 107 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 15 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.9 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.55 m | |
| Renault Clio is 23 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 573 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1518 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 130 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |