Renault Clio 1998 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 58 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 7 HP more power than Peugeot 106, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Peugeot 106. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.3 | |
|
The Peugeot 106 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Megane, Renault Kangoo | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 9 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 953 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 40 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 82 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Peugeot 106 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 106 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |