Renault Clio 1998 vs Renault Clio 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio 2002 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio 1998 engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Clio 2002, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Renault Clio 2002. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio 1998 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.4 | |
| Renault Clio 1998 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio 1998 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Dokker, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio 2002 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Clio 2002 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 1998 is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Clio 2002, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio 2002 has more luggage space. Renault Clio 1998 has 255 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio 2002. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio 1998 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Renault Clio 2002 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio 1998, so Renault Clio 2002 quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Clio has
| |