Renault Clio 1998 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
| Renault Clio and Peugeot 106 have the same engine power, but Renault Clio torque is 4 NM less than Peugeot 106. Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.8 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 620 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Dokker, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 306, Citroen Xsara Picasso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 9 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 5 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 40 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Peugeot 106 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 106 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |