Renault Clio 1998 vs Hyundai Getz 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 131 NM | 146 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Hyundai Getz is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 15 HP less power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Hyundai Getz. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
830 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 27 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Dokker, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.77 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai Getz, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 254 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 977 litres | |
Renault Clio has 1 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 58 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`530 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.6/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |