Renault Clio 1998 vs Skoda Felicia 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Skoda Felicia. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Skoda Felicia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Renault Clio is 9 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1035 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`420 kg | 1`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |