Renault Clio 2002 vs Renault Clio 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 131 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio 2002 is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio 2002 engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Clio 1998, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Renault Clio 1998. Thanks to more power Renault Clio 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.6 | |
| Renault Clio 2002 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 1998, which means that by driving the Renault Clio 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Dokker, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio 2002 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Clio 2002 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 2002 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Clio 1998, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio 2002 has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio 2002 has 255 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio 1998. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio 2002 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Clio 1998. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Renault Clio 2002 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio 1998, so Renault Clio 2002 quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Clio has
| |