Renault Clio 2002 vs Mazda 2 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 146 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Clio 2002 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 268 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1044 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 242 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 255 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |