Renault Clio 2001 vs Renault Clio 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 131 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio 2001 is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio 2001 engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Clio 1998, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Renault Clio 1998. Thanks to more power Renault Clio 2001 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio 2001 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio 2001 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 1998, which means that by driving the Renault Clio 2001 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio 2001 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 1998. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Dokker, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio 2001 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 2001 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Clio 1998, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio 2001 has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio 2001 has 255 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio 1998. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio 2001 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Clio 1998. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Clio has
| |