Renault Clio 2001 vs Hyundai Getz 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 17 HP less power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Hyundai Getz. Despite less power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 6.0 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | Used also on Hyundai Matrix | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
| Renault Clio and Hyundai Getz are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 977 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 256 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Hyundai Getz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Hyundai Getz, so Hyundai Getz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |