Renault Clio 2002 vs Hyundai Atos 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 59 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 83 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 20.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 16 HP more power than Hyundai Atos, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Hyundai Atos. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 7.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.8 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Atos, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.52 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 25 cm longer than the Hyundai Atos, 12 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1084 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 247 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Atos. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1.2 metres more than that of the Hyundai Atos, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Hyundai Atos has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Hyundai Atos, so Hyundai Atos quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai Atos has
| |