Renault Clio 2003 vs Fiat Punto 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 HP | 70 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 180 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
Fiat Punto is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP less power than Fiat Punto, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Fiat Punto. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 4.6 l/100km | |
The Fiat Punto is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Punto, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Punto. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
1350 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
1020 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.81 m | 3.86 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 5 cm shorter than the Fiat Punto, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 297 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1037 litres | 1080 litres | |
Fiat Punto has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 42 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Punto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Punto (by 43 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Fiat Punto. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`490 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | low | |
Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Punto has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Fiat Punto has
| |