Renault Clio 2003 vs Ford Focus 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
| Renault Clio and Ford Focus have the same engine power, but Renault Clio torque is 18 NM less than Ford Focus. Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.6 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Clio consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 36 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 1210 litres | |
|
Ford Focus has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 95 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 175 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.0/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Ford Focus has
| |