Renault Clio 2003 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 18 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, but torque is 1 NM less than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 2 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Fox, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1037 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 5 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 21 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Fox has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
| |