Renault Clio 2003 vs Hyundai Getz 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Getz is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 7 HP less power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Hyundai Getz. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Used also on Hyundai Accent | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
| Renault Clio and Hyundai Getz are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1037 litres | 977 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 1 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 60 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Hyundai Getz has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio, so Hyundai Getz quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.0/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |