Renault Clio 2005 vs Fiat Panda 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 131 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 12 HP more power than Fiat Panda, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Fiat Panda. Despite the higher power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Panda is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 560 km with real consumption | 480 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Clio 2005 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.58 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 45 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 13 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 82 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Panda. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 9.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 2.2 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Fiat Panda has
| |