Renault Clio 2005 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Renault Clio 2005 engine produces 1 HP more power than Renault Clio 2009, but torque is 20 NM less than Renault Clio 2009. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio 2005 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2009, which means that by driving the Renault Clio 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio 2005 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio 2009. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio 2005 is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Clio 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
| |