Renault Clio 2005 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, but Renault Clio torque is 21 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Fabia 2004 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Skoda Fabia 2004 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 6 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 1015 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 28 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |