Renault Clio 2005 vs Renault Modus 2004
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Renault Clio and Renault Modus have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Modus, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Modus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 49 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 20 cm longer than the Renault Modus, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 274 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 1283 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 14 litres more trunk space than the Renault Modus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Modus (by 248 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Modus, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Modus has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio, so Renault Modus quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
| |