Renault Clio 2005 vs Fiat Panda 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 102 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 15 HP more power than Fiat Panda, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Fiat Panda. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.58 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 45 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 13 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1.2 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 800 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Fiat Panda has
| |