Renault Clio 2005 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Despite less power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 15 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 1015 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 5 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Clio, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |