Renault Clio 2005 vs Fiat Panda 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 102 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Fiat Panda is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio and Fiat Panda have the same engine power, but Renault Clio torque is 9 NM less than Fiat Panda. Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.58 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio is 27 cm longer than the Fiat Panda, 6 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1.2 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 800 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Fiat Panda has
| |