Renault Clio 2005 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 24 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Chevrolet Aveo. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 11 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 35 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The Chevrolet Aveo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |