Renault Clio 2008 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 2 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Despite the higher power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2008 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2008 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.50 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |