Renault Clio 2008 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 151 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 3 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2008 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Clio 2008 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.50 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |