Renault Clio 2009 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Renault Clio engine produces 1 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 94 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Clio is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 300 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 12 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |