Renault Clio 2009 vs Seat Ibiza 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 5 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.43 m | |
| Renault Clio and Seat Ibiza are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 938 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 4 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`601 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |