Renault Clio 2009 vs Seat Ibiza 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is more dynamic to drive. Renault Clio engine produces 15 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 108 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Renault Clio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
| Renault Clio is 3 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 938 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 4 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`501 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |