Renault Clio 2009 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2011
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 85 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
Renault Clio engine produces 10 HP less power than Chevrolet Aveo, but torque is 10 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Due to the lower power, Renault Clio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Clio consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Clio could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Clio consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 46 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
1240 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
1010 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.03 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 1 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Aveo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 290 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 653 litres | |
Renault Clio has 2 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`675 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |